1. A JC is an academic session where we go through a scientific article for 1 hour.
2. It takes place every Friday.
3. Its purpose is to understand and discuss relevant elements about the content taking interactive and pedagogic notes (highlighting, underlining and using other learning resources) about the content.
4. We generate further appraisal, identify the opportunities of learning and formulate some potential research questions.
5. We write down the key-points of every session and publish them on our website
6. The article for the next session is posted one week in advance the must-read JC channel of our DISCORD server.

March, 2025

Journal CLUBS

2018 CID - Renal Dosing of Antibiotics Are We Jumping the Gun (Crass) [r].pdf

Codified by ABFL

Glossary: 

๐Ÿชฒ = microorganisms;
โ™พ = renal;
ATB = antibiotics;
Ccr = creatinine clearance;
CKD = chronic kidney disease;

1. EVIDENCE
   - ATB dose adjustments applies for stable CKD
   - May not apply to late late-phase trials and practice.
   - Ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and telavancin โžฉ all have precautionary

     statements for โ†“ clinical response (Ccr 30-50) โžฉ no need to adjust doses
2. ATB elimination is mostly relevant in acute cases during the 1st 48h
3. Toxicity + efficacy should be considered in every ATB
4. FDA โžฉ inferior EFFICACY in moderate โ™พ impairment.
5. GOAL โžฉ Keep efficacy with the โ†“ toxicity possible.
6. CKD studies available in CKD are small, early phase of healthy
7. โ€œAntibiotics do not fit cleanly into this paradigm due to overwhelmingly episodic, rather than

    chronic, use.โ€ Crass 2018

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:22:41
Round: 5 01:11:57 Comments
Round: 4 27:19:13 JC main points
Round: 3 32:18:27 JC intro
Round: 2 12:30:77 Codification discussion

Round: 1 09:21:62 Past JC

Friday, January 10 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

ABFL, CORA, AMA, MAAT, DFM, HIBN, AAQC

2024 CC - Feasibility and safety of ultra-low volume ventilation (โ‰ค 3 mlkg) combined w_ECCO2R in ARF (monet) [R].pdf

Codified by MAAT

Glossary:  ๐Ÿซ = lungs; ๐Ÿค” = analysis; โŽ = return; ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome; BLUE = The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2024, BLUE, FR โž– retro_prag_๐Ÿค” - cohort โž• 41pxs โž• 8y (2014 - 2022) โž– P I C O:
   - P: adults + ECCO2R
   - I: Vt โ‰ค3mL/Kg (ultra-protective vent)
   - C: NA
   - O: p_OC = feasibiliy (proportion of sessions) โž– s_OC = efficacy + safety + others (adverse

     events, SS90)
3. EVIDENCE:    - โ€ฆ

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:13:20

Round: 4 10:34:78 Comments
Round: 3 51:30:02 ART ultra-low volume ventilation
Round: 2 05:36:00 Select ART
Round: 1 05:39:31 Past JC

Friday, January 3 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

ABFL, CORA, AMA, MAAT, DFM, HIBN, AAQC

Friday, January 24 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

ABFL, MAAT, JCAU, HIBN, MACR, GMC, AMA, AAQC

2021 HHP - How many fruits+vegetables do we really need (Circulation).pdf
2021 CIRCULATION - Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality, 2 Prospective Cohort Studies + MA of 26 Studies (wang) [MA]

Codified by ABFL
Codified by ACE แต—แต‰แตƒแต

Glossary: 

๐Ÿซ = lungs, COPD; ๐Ÿง  = brain, stroke; ๐Ÿซ€ = heart, cardiovascular disease; WHO = World Health Organization; WCRF = World Cancer Research Fund; NHSE = National Health Service of England


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2021, CIRCULATION, USA โž– obs_PROS + MA โž• 2M | pros = >66k in โ™€ (1984-2014) โ€“ >42k iin โ™‚ (1986-2014) โ–ถ MA = 1.8M โž• 30y โž– P I C O:
   - P: adults
   - I: pooled self-reported health and diet information
   - C: NA
   - O: MM โžฉ Results:
            โ€ข 10%. โ†“r CA - (0.90)
            โ€ข 12%. โ†“r ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿซ€ (HR 0.88)
            โ€ข 13%. โ†“r MM (HR 0.87)
            โ€ข 15 35%. โ†“r ๐Ÿซ COPD (0.65)
3. EVIDENCE:
  - Leafy green vegetables: kale + spinach
  - Fruits & vegetables: vitamin C + beta carotene (ANTIOXIDANTS)
  - NO BENEFIT in MM โžฉ >5 servings OR starchy veggies OR potatoes OR drinking fruit juices.
  - Veggies only = no โ†“ CA (p=0.62)
  - RECCO diver among countries โžฉ
       * 8.5 servings in AUS
       * 6 servings in DEN
       * 5 servings in WHO, WCRF, NHSE

  - Fruit juices + potatoes = โ†‘ glycemic load (various DIETARY RECOMM include them)

  - How much you eat in average MATTERS โžฉ if NOT achieved THE GOAL, you can

    compensate the day after.

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:27:38

Round: 8 00:01:30 The end
Round: 7 06:31:64 Wrap-up
Round: 6 12:09:86 Images + keypoints
Round: 5 37:44:75 ART 1 original
Round: 4 21:01:46 ART 1 prequel
Round: 3 04:19:04 Selection
Round: 2 02:13:15 Past JCRound: 1 03:37:75 Past JC

2024 CC - Comparison of methods to normalize urine output in CIpxs, a multicenter cohort study (monard) [R].pdf

Codified by MAAT

Glossary: 

โ™พ = kidneys; ABW = actual body weight; AKD = acute kidney disease;

CH = Switzerland; coh = cohort; DE = Germany; h_DIS โ€‰=โ€‰ Hospital discharge; IBW = ideal body weight;

mc = multicentric; UO = urinary output.

1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2024, CC, CH + USA โž– mc_coh โž• 15,322 + 28,610 (derivation + validation) โž• CH 2010-2020 โž– P I C O:
     - P: adults, CI pxs
     - I: CH (Lausโ€™AKI, derivation coh) ๐Ÿ†š USA (MIMIC-IV, validation coh)
     - C: NA
     - O: best predictor for UO
3. EVIDENCE:
   - Oliguria = <0.5mL/Kg/h in โ‰ฅ6h
   - Presents in 75% of CI pxs + โ†” MM90
   - Estimation of weight is inaccurate
   - ABW โžฉ massive variations (fluid overload + muscle mass loss + obesity + underweight)
   - Types of BW: pre-admission + actual + ideal + adjusted
   - Series (493 pxs = overestimation) + 2 large studies (USA + DE = confirmed)
   - 4th study (S + 569pxs) not influenced by the method (oliguria & MM)
   - The four studies = single center
4. METHODS.
- DEF โž  Best predictor for UO = most closely โ†” w_mean UO d_UCI
- IN โž 
  * Lausโ€™AKI: โ‰ฅ18yo, Lausanne, Jan 2010 - Jun 2020
  * MIMIC-IV: Boston, 2008 - 2019
- EX โž 
  * Lausโ€™AKI + MIMIC-IV: refused, u_HD, <6h UO measurement, no sCr, no weight, no height,

    vesical irrigation d_ICU stay.
- RANDOM โž 
- INTERV โž  1st. Best predictor was chosen 2nd. Compared OLIGURIA INCIDENCE w_: a. MM90, b. AKD at H+dis โžฉ according to ABW or IBW (which normalized better)
6. RESULTS
   - USA cohort: heavier, older, lower in SAPS-II (than CH cohort)
   - Best UO predictor = IBW (โ€˜oliguria incidenceโ€™ was constant)

   - IBW โžฉ โ†—๏ธ association โ†” oliguria w_: MM90 & AKD

   - After correction (sex, SAPS-II): ALL FINDINGS PERSISTED

Friday, January 17 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

ABFL, MAAT, JCAU, HIBN, MACR, GMC, AMA, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:18:15
Round: 5 06:07:41 Figures
Round: 4 20:28:69 Content + wu
Round: 3 33:11:79 Article UO

Round: 2 06:06:67 Article choice

Round: 1 12:21:18 Past JC

2025 CC - Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in MV pxs w_low Vt in ICU (mallat) [srMA].pdf

Codified by MAAT

Glossary: 

๐Ÿ’จ = flow = perfusion; ๐Ÿซ = lungs; ๐Ÿซ€ = heart; FC = fluid challenge; FR = fluid responsiveness; PPV = pulse pressure variation.


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, CC, UAE โž– srMA โž• 5 studies (474 pxs) โž• PROSPERO - publication (1y) โž– P I C O:
     - P: โ†“Vt 
     - I: โˆ†PPV & โˆ†PPV% a_PLR following โ€˜โ€ฆnot a drop of fluidโ€™
     - C: fluid challenge or response to PLR
     - O: ability to predict FR in โ†“ Vt MV
3. EVIDENCE:
   - 1st line therapy = fluid administration โžฉ tissue hypoperfusion context
   - FC AIM = โ†‘ preload + CI โžฉ ๐Ÿ” DO2 + tissue ๐Ÿ’จ
   - Excessive fluid โžฉ peripheral + ๐Ÿซ edema + poor OC
   - Deficient fluid โžฉ MOF + MM
   - 50% are fluid responsive- PPV accurately predicts FR in MV pxs โžฉ only if Vt โ‰ฅ8 โžฉ

     OTHERWISE (Vt <8), insufficient to induce changes in THORACIC PRESSURE &

     PRELOAD.

Friday, January 31 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, HIBN, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:28:32
Round: 4 06:18:93 Comments
Round: 3 01:07:40 ART
Round: 2 09:17:00 ART selection
Round: 1 05:16:43 Past JC

January, 2025

2025 CC - Cardiovascular effects of lactate in healthy adults (berg-hansen) [R].pdf

Codified by MAAT

Glossary: 

๐Ÿซ€ = heart; AHF = acute heart failure; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; eo_PER = end organ perfusion; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; GLS = global longitudinal strain; Ea = effective arterial elastance; HEC = hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp; LAC = half-molar lactate; Lac 45g/L + Na 15g/L; MAP = mean arterial pressure; SAL = sodium-matched hypertonic sodium chloride; Na 15g/L, Cl 23 g/L; SV = stroke volume; SVR = systemic vascular resistance. .


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, CC, DK โž– RCT, single-blinded, crossover โž• 8 โž• March - June 2021 โž– P I C O:
   - P: healthy
   - I: LAC (4h infusion)
   - C: SAL
   - O: CO (by ECHO); sOC = SV, LVEF, GLS, Ea, SVR
3. EVIDENCE:
   - Usually large amounts of fluids are needed to โ†‘ CO + โ†— eo_PER
   - No consensus about the optimal type of fluid resuscitation.
   - MORTALITY = โ†‘ fluids OR โ†“ fluids
   - Small-volume resuscitation w_hypertonic saline โžฉ proposal โžฉ
        * โž• : โ†— CO + vascular tone + microcirculation.
        * โž– : Careful w_hyperchloremia + metabolic acidosis
        * โž– : โ™พ vasoconstriction + โ†“ GFR
   - Hypertonic crystalloid solutions
        * โž• : โ†— HD effects wo_chloride + โ†— eo_PER & CO (AHF + af_CABG)
4. METHODS.
   - IN โž  โ™‚ + โ‰ฅ18yo + BMI 18-30
   - EX โž  daily med + abnormalities in routine screening tests + acute or chronic disease

     (known ๐Ÿซ€ failure)
   - RANDOM โž  14 day interval (minimum) = washout
        * โŠ– strenuous physical activity + alcohol
        * โŠ• regular diet for 48h before each study day
   - INTERV โž  ECHO + blood samples
        * T0, 60, 120, 240
        * HEC was used at 180 min (main study) โžฉ 240min was w_HEC
        * HEC = insulin (0.6mU/Kg/min) + glucose (20%)
   - CONSORT was used (as stated by Equator)
6. RESULTS. LAC ๐Ÿ†š SAL
   - LAC โ†‘ :
        1. Lactate = โ†‘ 1.9mmol/L 
        2. CO = โ†‘ 1L/min = due to SV of 11mL
        3. LVEF = โ†‘ 5 percentage points
        4. GLS = โ†‘ 1.5 percentage points
        5. Contractility = โ†—
   - LAC = :
       1. HR = no change
       2. MAP = similar
   - LAC โ†“ :
       1. Afterload (SVR + Ea)= โ†“
   - SAL:
       1. Preload indicator = โ†‘
7. RATIONALE
   - โ†— ๐Ÿซ€ function โžฉ โ†‘ CO, SV, LVEF in LAC

   - Contractility โ†— โž• afterload โ†“ โž• preload = (stable)

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:29:52
Round: 8 03:32:41 Comments
Round: 7 27:45:06 Wrap-up
Round: 6 15:06:89 Figures
Round: 5 17:55:76 Methods
Round: 4 06:36:59 Intro
Round: 3 11:21:90 Abstract
Round: 2 01:17:91 ART selection
Round: 1 06:16:33 Past JC

Friday, February 14, 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, MACR, DFM, JQB, MAAT, HIBN, AAQC

CC 2015 - Passive leg raising, five rules, not a drop of fluid (monnet, teboul).pdf


1. โ†‘ 300mL venous blood from โ†“body โ†’ right ๐Ÿซ€

2. 5 rules:
      - 1st. Start from semi-recumbent position โ–ถ 1 study = poor reliability if this rule is not

        followed
      - 2nd. Measure CO โ–ถ not w_BP only (mechs: arterial compliance + pulse wave

        amplication) โ–ถ HOWEVER, MAP โ‰ฅ10% could be a good predictor. (2016 CHEST -

        Passive Leg Raise Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Nicom and Flatcar Devices

        in Septic Shock: Preliminary Findings. It worked w_NICOM)

     - 3rd. In 1 min. โ–ถ Real time CO measurement is needed
     - 4rd. Measure CO a_PLR

     - 5th. Do not touch (avoid adrenergic stimulation) โž• PLR does not โ†‘ HR

2025 CC - Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in MV pxs w_low Vt in ICU (mallat) [srMA].pdf

Codified by MAAT

Glossary: 





1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, CC, UAE โž– srMA โž• 5 studies (474 pxs) โž• PROSPERO - publication (1y), till Aug 2024 โž– P I C O:
    - P: โ†“Vt
    - I: โˆ†PPV & โˆ†PPV% a_PLR following โ€˜โ€ฆnot a drop of fluidโ€™
    - C: fluid challenge or response to PLR
    - O: ability to predict FR in โ†“ Vt MV
3. EVIDENCE:
   - 1st line therapy = fluid administration โžฉ tissue hypoperfusion context
   - FC AIM = โ†‘ preload + CI โžฉ ๐Ÿ” DO2 + tissue ๐Ÿ’จ
   - Excessive fluid โžฉ peripheral + ๐Ÿซ edema + poor OC
   - Deficient fluid โžฉ MOD + MM
   - 50% are fluid responsive
   - PPV accurately predicts FR in MV pxs โžฉ only if Vt โ‰ฅ8 โžฉ OTHERWISE (Vt <8 of ideal body

     weight), insufficient to induce changes in THORACIC PRESSURE & PRELOAD.
   - PLR is an ACCUTE METHOD to predict FR in โ†“ Vt (real-time CI is needed)
   - Real-time CI NOT ALWAYS AVAILABLE โžฉ or technically ineligible (ECHO echogenicity)
   - PPV after PLR = good method (predict FR) โžฉ SBA + โ†“ Vt + MV pxs + PO critILL pxs (2021    - 2024) โ–ถ ROC curve issues (0.78 to 0.98) + wide 95%CI
4. METHODS.
- IN โž  PubMed, Embase, Cochrane
- INTERV โž 
  - โˆ†PPV = end_PPV - baseline_PPV
  - โˆ†PPV% = end _ PPV - baseline_PPV) / baseline_PPV 1 x 100 โ–ถ baseline = the patient in

    the 45 semi-recumbent position BEFORE PLR test
  - A PLR test was then performed using an automatic elevation bed by raising the patientโ€™s

    lower limbs to a 45 angle while the patientโ€™s trunk was lowered from a semi-recumbent to

    supine position with no changes in the hip angle

  - โ€ฆ


๐Ÿ’จ = flow = perfusion; ๐Ÿซ = lungs; ๐Ÿซ€ = heart; CI = cardiac index; FC = fluid challenge; FR = fluid responsiveness; MOD = Multiorgan disfunction; PO = postoperative; PPV = pulse pressure variation; SBA = spontaneous breathing activity.

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:38:37
Round: 4 12:19:53 Wrap-up
Round: 3 42:23:90 PLR technique
Round: 2 37:11:54 JC

Round: 1 06:42:31 Past JC

Friday, February 7 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

DFM, AMA, DD, HIBN, AAQC

2024 JACC - From ST-Segment Elevation MI to Occlusion MI (McLaren) [r].pdf

Codified by AMA

Glossary: 

ACC = American College of Cardiology, ACO = acute coronary occlusion, INT = interpretation, MI = myocardial infarction, OMI = occlusion MI, STEMI = ST-segment elevation MI.


1. Q-wave/non-Q wave โžฉ STEMI ๐Ÿ†š non-STEMI โžฉ OMI
2. 25% from non-STEMI have ACO โžฉ limitation
3. OMI rises based on โœ” or โœ– of ACO
4. OMI paradigm = advanced ECG (INT aided by AI โž• ECHO โž• imaging โž• refractory

    ischemia (clinical signs).
5. Benefits of OMI paradigm = opportunity to transform ER ๐Ÿซ€ +โ†—๏ธpxs care.
6. Thomas Kuhn introduced the concept of PARADIGM SHIFT
7. To guide problem solving activities โžฉ definition + methods
8. 2021 CIRCULATION โžฉ although the dichotomuos classification (STEMI/non-STEMI), IT IS

    LIKELY that the main pathophysiological event is ACUTE VESSEL OCCLUSION

    (determining prognosis + natural history).
9. ACC consensus (2022) โžฉ STEMI criteria (12-lead ECG) misses A SIGNIFICANT MINORITY

    of pxs w_ACO.
10. Alencar, 3 studies โžฉ STEMI criteria for ACO = sensibility 44%

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:09:58
Round: 5 01:33:50 Comments
Round: 4 13:41:71 wrap-up
Round: 3 34:16:12 ART
Round: 2 08:23:64 ART selection
Round: 1 12:03:40 Past JC

Friday, February 28 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, MAAT, GMC, MACR, HIBN, AAQC

2025 CC -Effect of an intensive care unit virtual reality interventions on mental health (Drop) [RCT].pdf

Codified by AMA

Glossary: 

C19 = COVID-19; DIS = discharge; HRQoL = health-related quality of life; ICU-VR = intensive care unit virtual reality; MH = mental health; PICS-F = post-intensive care syndrome-family; PTS = post-traumatisc stress; rel = relatives; SOC = standard of care; TECH = technology


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, CC, NL โž– mc_px-cluste_RCT โž• 189 rel โž• 1y3m = Jan 2021 - Apr 2022 (+6m after DIS) โž– P I C O:
   - P: rel (adult pxs)
   - I: SOC + ICU-VR (100 rel of 81 pxs)
   - C: SOC (89 rel of 80 pxs)
   - O: symptoms of MH distress (DIFF โ†” prevalence + severity of PTSD + anxiety +

     depression). sOC = understanding of ICU environment & procedure โž• perspectives

     toward ICU-VR
3. EVIDENCE:
   - Mental health challenges in CI pxsโ€™ rel: PTS + anxiety + depression
   - MH sequealae
4. METHODS.
   - IN โž  rel 1st or 2nd degree โž• ICU stay โ‰ฅ72h โž• multiple rel could participate
   - EX โž  language barrier โž• no TECH โž• no formal ๐Ÿก address.
   - RANDOM โž  all relatives from one px were assigned to the SAME GROUP (โ†“ r of cross-

     contamination) โžฉ STRATIFIED in centers โž• ability to visit the hospital (C19)
   - INTERV โž  48h after admission (time to approach the rel) โž• rel could share the study-

     relation info
      * 14 min
      * Voice-over pre-recorded
      * Mock patient lying
6. RESULTS
   - Baseline, discharge, 1, 3, 6 months โžฉ study periods (questionnaire)
   - NO DIFF in pOC
   - DIFF on understanding of ICU treatment โž• perception/perspective on ICU-VR โžฉ BOTH โ†—
7. RATIONALE
      * A more tailored, multifaceted approach, incorporating a combination of interventions like         ICU-VR at different stages of the ICU experience may prove more effective.
8. LIMITATIONS    

   - Not blinded to rel & investigators (blinded to researcher)

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:25:47
Round: 7 07:25:35 Comments
Round: 6 11:46:41 Results
Round: 5 30:00:94 Methods
Round: 4 16:27:26 INTRO
Round: 3 11:42:31 JC, abstract
Round: 2 03:16:61 ART selection
Round: 1 05:08:43 past JC

Friday, February 21 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, MAAT, DFM, MACR, HIBN, AAQC

Friday, March 14 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, MACR, DFM, JQB, MAAT, HIBN, AAQC

2024 JACC - From ST-Segment Elevation MI to Occlusion MI (McLaren) [r].pdf

Codified by ABFL

Glossary: 

ACC = American College of Cardiology, ACO = acute coronary occlusion, Computerized Tomography, Delayed Invasive Intervention in Patients With Nonโ€“ST-Segmentโ€“Elevation Myocardial Infarction, INT = interpretation, MI = myocardial infarction, OMI = occlusion MI, RIDDLE-NSTEMI = Randomized Study of Immediate Versus, STD = ST-segment depression, STEMI = ST-segment elevation MI, TIMACS = Timing of Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes, VERDICT = Very EaRly vs Deferred Invasive evaluation using.


1. Image of non-STEMI = STEMI (occluded) + non-STEMI (nonocclusive thrombus)
2. Clear deviation from actual evidence โžฉ real occlusion in non-STEMI
3. ST criteria (age, sex) = Healthy ๐Ÿ†š CKMB measured MI pxs โžฉ DESPITE THISโ€ฆ REC

    differentiation of MI w_ & wo_ACO
4. NORMAL SCIENCE = persistence of a paradigm (successful in its aim, steady expansion) =

    DOES NOT aim at novelties
5. OCs of STEMI criteria โžฉ best reperfuse + โ†“ reperfusion delays
6. STEMI paradigm โžฉ
       * โ†—๏ธREPERFUSION strategies & techniques
            - Angiography
            - Stenting
            - Medications
            - Door-to-balloon (time is myocardium)
       * โ†—๏ธ๐Ÿซ€ ER + INTERdisciplinary collaboration:
            - โŠ• Cath lab
            - Paramedics BYPASSING ER departments
            - Rapid assembling of interventional ๐Ÿซ€ teams
       * 2 quality โ†—๏ธ:
            - โ†“ reperfusion delays
            - โ†“ false positives STEMI
       * NOVELTY:
            - No false negatives found โžฉ ECG wo_STEMI criteria + ACO = NOT considered a false

              (-) STEMI โžฉ โ€œAs a result, the patient will be denied emergent reperfusionโ€
            - McLaren stated this problem in 2023 AJEM, Missing occlusion
       * Evidence
            - Trials have not regarded this type of cases
            - Many non-STEMI trials have reperfusion time limitations โžฉ TIMACS 16h (unstable

              angina, non-STEMI) to reperfusion.
            - VERDICT (unstable angina, non-STEMI) = benefit from 4.7h of reperfusion.
            - RIDDLE-NSTEMI = โ†“ MM in immediate reperfusion
            - NSTEMI exclude refractory ischemia OR HD/electrical instability

            - 6.4% of VERY-HIGH NSTEMI โžฉ angio in 2h

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:24:22
Round: 4 00:50:82 Comments
Round: 3 23:33:13 wrap-up
Round: 2 47:53:53 JC
Round: 1 12:05:49 Past 2 JCs

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:25:47
Round: 7 07:25:35 Comments
Round: 6 11:46:41 Results
Round: 5 30:00:94 Methods
Round: 4 16:27:26 INTRO
Round: 3 11:42:31 JC, abstract
Round: 2 03:16:61 ART selection
Round: 1 05:08:43 past JC

2024 JACC - From ST-Segment Elevation MI to Occlusion MI (McLaren) [r].pdf

Codified by ABFL

Glossary: 

ACC = American College of Cardiology, ACO = acute coronary occlusion, INT = interpretation, MI = myocardial infarction, OMI = occlusion MI, STEMI = ST-segment elevation MI.


1. SHIFT โžฉ scope + precision change OR stay when PARADIGM is more successful (few

    problems resolved) - acute ones
2. STEMI criteria as SURROGATE of ACO = limited in scope + precision
3. 1994 MA โžฉ โ€œECG w_STEMI criteria = emergent reperfusionโ€
      - Suspected MI
      - w_limited or NO ECG
      - Treated w_streptokinase
      - MI determined by CK-MB
      - CRUDE separation = poor definition
      - 4 studies โžฉ no ECG requirements for enrollment
      - cautioned about denying reperfusion in patients without STE.
      - Few deaths + data-dependent emphasis could be misleading
4. Kuhn โžฉ paradigms start FLEXIBLEโ€ฆ and then become RIGID
5. GLs:
      1. 1996 โžฉ advised THROMBOLYTICS for hyper acute T or ST-seg depression V1-V4 from

           POSTERIOR MI (experienced expertise is needed)
      2. 1999 โžฉ advised CLASSIFY โ€œw_STE or LBBBโ€ + โ€œnonDx ECGsโ€ (even being posterior

           infarctions)
      3. โˆ‘ STEMI paradigm emerged w_2 โ‰  entities: STEMI ๐Ÿ†š non-STEMI

Friday, March 07 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

MAAT, HIBN, AAQC

February, 2025

2025 ICM - How we use ultrasound in the mm of weaning from MV (Tuinman) [ed].pdf

Codified by ABFL

Glossary: 

๐Ÿซ  = lungs, ๐Ÿซ€ = heart,๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ = abdomen = abdominal, AbP = abdominal pressure, af_ = after, antiISCHE = anti-ischemic, CCUS = critical care ultrasound, DE = diaphragm excursion, Di = diaphragm, DIS = disease, DYSF = dysfunction, DW = difficult weaning, HTA = hypertension, IAP = intraabdominal pressure, iFunction = impaired function, MIP = maximal inspiratory effort = maximal inspiratory pressure, MV = mechanical ventilation, PSIC = parasternal intercostal, PSLA = parasternal long axis, PSSA = parasternal short axis, SBT = spontaneous breathing trial, TECHS = techniques, TFdi = thickening fraction of the diaphragm, WF = weaning failure.


1. DW โžฉ โ†‘ adverse clinical OCsโž• resources (limited healthcare)
2. DW = failure SBT โžฉ causes of WF โ–ถ iFunction: ๐Ÿซ ๐Ÿซ€ Di
3. CCUS โžฉ valuable DX tool โžฉ MV, weaning, readiness for weaning, causes of WF, ๐Ÿซ€โ€“๐Ÿซ function, TTO response.
4. ABCDE-US โžฉ pathophysioly of WF โžฉ DX โž• monitoring = CAUSE oF WF
       1. ABCDE โžฉ
              - it is an ADJUNCT to clinical parameter + physical examination
              - Timing: MV > 48h
              - Frequency: follow-up determined by a. Cause, b. Course DIS     
        2. ๐Ÿซ€:
              - DYSF โžฉ MOST frequent causes of WF
              - 1st. TTE. views (PSLA, PSSA, apical 2, 3, 4, 5 chamber, subcostal) โžฉ eye-balling: to

                 estimate SIZE + FUNCTION both ventricles โž• wall abnormalities OR ๐Ÿซ€ effusion
              - 2nd. TTE by educated in ECHO. If CAUSE not clear
              - 3rd. TEE. Diastolic function (E/A and E/eโ€™ ratios) when FAILING an SBT. Wall motion

                abnormalities + ๐Ÿซ€ valves (stenosis + regurgitation)
              - TTO โžฉ fluid removal โž• antiHTA โž• antiISCHE
        3. ๐Ÿซ :
              - Aeration score + P.eff.
                  * QUALITATIVE โ–ถ 6 views DX cause of ARF (sliding, pleural abnormalities, lung

                     profiles ABC, pleural effusion, consolidation w_or wo_ air bronchograms) โž–

                     careful w_deterministic fashion interpretation
                  * QUANTITATIVE โ–ถ 12 views โžฉ calculare ๐Ÿซ aeration score โžฉ monitor ๐Ÿซ

                     pathology over time
                  * r_extubation failure โ–ถ 8 views โžฉ โ† โ†’ SBT โžฉ
                  * โ‰ฅ5 B-lines = extubation failure (independent fro LV filling presssures)
                  * OCs โ–ถ weaning readiness + WF cause + monitor DIS progression & TTO

                     response.
         4. ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ:
               - โ†‘ AbP โžฉ can affect MECHS โˆ‘ weaning
               - US โ–ถ screen aspect FREE FLUID (โ†“ anechoic) ๐Ÿ†š heterogenous (โ†‘ echoic) +

                  septum (useful for the cause of free fluid)
               - Paracentesis DX and TTO
           5. Di:
               - Highly prevalent โžฉ DYSF of Di
               - US: to exclude Di DYSF โžฉ af_FAILED initial SBT
               - DE = subcostal OR subxiphoid (liver OR spleen as acoustic windows)
                  * IF not clear โ–ถ use  INTERCOSTAL (zone of apposition to DISPLACEMENT of

                     liver

                     OR spleen) = qualititve alternative.
                  * Measured d_spontaneous breathing wo_ventilator support.
                  * In cooperative PXS โžฉ MIP to assess MAX excursion
               - Contractility: TFdi (via INTERCOSTAL) โ–ถ
                  * โ†‘ = edema โž– fibrosis (careful)
                  * โ†“ = atrophy
                  * DYSF = DE <20mm
                  * WF (predictive) = TFdi <30-35% โž• DE <10-15mm
            6. Extra-Di
                - ExtraDi muscles help Di weakness โžฉ successful SBT BUT potential WF
                - Expiratory muscle atrophy = impairment of airway clearance โžฉ WF
                - US: PSIC + rectus abdominis muscle + external oblique, internal oblique &

                  transversus abdominis (same window).
                - Consider always IAP (due to GEOMETRY + MOBILITY)
                - Thickening fraction of INTERCOSTAL MUSCLES >10% = โ†‘r_WF
7. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
                - CLINICAL trials โ–ถโ†—๏ธ  predictive performance of ๐Ÿซ + Di
                - DX continuous data โ–ถ โ†—๏ธ predictive performance of ๐Ÿซ + ๐Ÿ†• indications
                - Advanced TECHS โ–ถ speckle tracking (quantification of perfusion + better function

                  estimation).

8. These measurements can be used to form a definition of diaphragm dysfunction, although

    there is variation in this definition: It has been defined as a thickening fraction of less than

    20% or a tidal excursion of less than 10 mm โ€“ 2019 UJ - A narrative review of diaphragm

    ultrasound to predict weaning from MV, where are we and where are we heading (turton) [r]

Friday, March 28 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, AHO, GMC, HIBN, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
02:13:08
Round: 5 06:52:74 Comments
Round: 4 58:27:56 Wrap-up
Round: 3 46:41:93 ART
Round: 2 06:47:19 ART selection
Round: 1 14:19:46 past JC

Glossary (most used)

โ†‘ = increase, โ†“ = decrease,โ†—๏ธ = improve,โ†˜๏ธ = worsen, ๐—˜๐—ซ = exclusion, ๐—œ๐—ก = inclusion, โ˜… = recommendation(s), ๐Ÿ—ฃ = suggestion(s), critILL = critically ill, DX = diagnosis, h_LOS = Hospital length of stay, icu_LOS = ICU length of stay, inc_ = incident, MA = metaanalysis, mc = multicentric, MM = mortality, MM90 = mortality at 90 days, pxs = patients, pOC = primary outcome(s), sOC = secondary outcome(s), SS = survival, w_ = with, wo_ = without, RCT = randomized controlled trial, sr = systematic review, yo = years old.


Brief scope glossary
    - ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ brief scope โ†ฉ
    - Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O: โ†ฉ
    - year (Y), journal (J), country (C) โž– type of study (T) โž• number of patients/sample (N) โž• time (t) โž– population (P),     

      intervention (I), comparison (C), outcome (O, OC).

General Glossary

Complete glossary here

Friday, April 11 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

HIBN, AAQC

2025 CC - Ventilation-induced AKI in ARF Do PEEP levels matter (Benites) [r].pdf

Codified by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

๐Ÿซง = alveolar, AF = atrial fibrillation, AKI = acute kidney injury, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, CA = cancer, GE = gastroenterology, MV = mechanical ventilation, Ppl = pleural pressure, VR = vascular resistance.


1. ARDS & MV
       - ARDS = major issue in CIpxs
       - MV = crucial for TTO, with PEEP (Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) being a key setting.
2. High vs. Low PEEP โ€“ The Debate
       - โ†‘ PEEP:
           * a.โ†—๏ธ๐Ÿซ compliance โž• O2
           * b. โŒ inconclusive effects โžฉ MM or d_MV.
       - โ†“ PEEP:
           * May โŠ– overdistension but r_โ†‘ poor O2
       - Optimal PEEP is still controversial.
3. Organ Crosstalk
       - Improper PEEP affects: โค๏ธ ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿงฝ
       - ARDS pxs develop AKI (strong MM marker)
4. ๐Ÿซ - ๐Ÿงฝ crosstalk d_MV
       - Gas Exchange Issues (โ†“O2, โ†‘CO2)
       - Remote Biotrauma = Inflammatory mediators affecting distant organs
       - HD changes = โ†“ venous return + โ†“ CO โ†’ Renal perfusion issues
5. h_PEEP & ๐Ÿงฝ Function โ€“ The ๐Ÿซ Dynamics
       - w_high recruitability = ๐Ÿซง reopening + โ†‘ Pp โžฉ Vena cava compression โ†’ Systemic &

         renal congestion
       - w_low recruitability = Minimal volume gain + ๐Ÿซง overdistension + ๐Ÿ’ฅ Vascular

         compression + โ†‘ ๐Ÿซ VR โžฉ renal impairment.
6. More research is needed to:
       - Fine-tune PEEP settings
       - Maximize ๐Ÿซ benefits
       - โ†“ ๐Ÿงฝ and systemic harm
7. Think beyond the lungs when ventilating ARDS patients!

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:04:43
Round: 5 00:29:71 FInal comments
Round: 4 50:21:89 ART all
Round: 3 06:06:42 ART abstract
Round: 2 07:24:68 ART selection
Round: 1 00:21:12 Last JC 8 min

2021 Intl J Gynecology Obste - Fetal growth and spontaneous preterm birth in highโ€altitude pregnancy (grant) [srMA].pdf

Codified by AAACC

Glossary: 

๐Ÿ‘ถ๐Ÿผ = infants = infancy, bW = birth weight, hALT = high altitude, LBW = Low Birth Weight, Preg = pregnant, SGA = Small for Gestational Age, sPTB = Spontaneous Preterm Birth


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2021, IJGO, UK โž– srMA โž• 2524, 59 IN โž• -Nov 11, 2020 โž– P I C O:
      - P: hALT pregnant
      - I: preg hALT
      - C: preg non-hALT
      - O: pOC = hALT impact on LBW, SGA, SPTB | sOC = magnitude LBW
3. EVIDENCE:
      - hALT physiological changes โžฉ pregnancy adaptations + hypobaric hypoxia
      - ๐Ÿ‘ถ๐Ÿผ born at hALT = "lighterโ€ (LBW)
      - LBW โ†” short/long-term uOC
      - https://www.floodmap.net
4. METHODS.
      - ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
      - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
      - RANDOM โž 
      - INTERV โž 
6. RESULTS
7. RATIONALE
8. LIMITATIONS

Friday, April 04 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, AHO, BAH, HIBN, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:48:53
Round: 7 04:24:00 Finish
Round: 6 37:28:01 Results
Round: 5 14:58:50 Methods + Inclusion
Round: 4 09:53:45 Introduction
Round: 3 07:54:63 ART abstract
Round: 2 10:10:66 ART selection
Round: 1 24:04:51 Past JC

May, 2025

Friday, April 25 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AHO, HIBN, AAQC

2025 CC - Limitations of SpO2 FiO2-ratio f_ class_ + monitoring of ARDS (Erlebach) [R].pdf

Codified  by AMA

Glossary: 

ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, C = ICU cockpit, DBs = databases, M = MIMIC-IV, MV = mechanical ventilation, PF = PaO2/FiO2, RLS = resource limited settings, S = SICdb, SF = SpO2/FiO2.


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, CC, CH โž– retro_obs_cohort โž• >700 โž• 3 DATABASES (MIMIC-IV = 2008-2022, SICdb = 2013-2021, ICU cockpit = since 2016 ) โž– P I C O:
         * P: ARDS
         * ๐Ÿ…ธ: SpO2, FiO2, PaO2 โžฉ SF
         * ๐Ÿ…ฒ: NA โžฉ PF
         * O: pOC = accuracy (correct/total classifications) | sOC = accuracy per severity +

           trending ability to correlate w_FiO2
3. EVIDENCE:
   - New global definition โžฉ SpO2/FiO2 (additional โ†“O2 criterion) for RLS
   - PF used by major interventional trials
   - Simplicity + practicality โžฉ most widely used surrogate
   - Disadvantage โžฉ ABG needed โž• availability in RLS โž• complications (vascular injury, ๐Ÿฉธ

      oma, ๐Ÿชฒ , thrombosis, nerve injury)
4. METHODS.
   - ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
     * M = USA, 65k - 1h resolution
     * S = Austria - 27k, 1-per-min data
     * C = Switzerland - 2,4k - >200Hz, continuous signals
     * ARDS population
          * C = manually selection w_Berlin definition.
          * S + M = ICD codes (9 and 10)
          * โ†“O2: PFโ‰ค300 โžฉ MV, NIV, CPAP โž• PEEP โ‰ฅ5 or HFNO flowโ‰ฅ30.
          * IF multiple admission, only the 1st was IN
   - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž  ECMO
   - INTERV โž  3 datapoints โž• severity based on thresholds
   - DATA MANAGEMENT โž  Datapoints for each ABG measurement:
     * M = with hourly data, values were matched within a 30-minute window.
     * C = ABG timing was identified using gaps in arterial pressure waveforms. If no gap =

        within 15 min โ† the ABG timestamp, median values from 5 to 2 minutes prior (FiOโ‚‚ and

        SpOโ‚‚)
     * S, FiOโ‚‚ and SpOโ‚‚ were matched with some time delay allowance (details cut off).
    - ANALYSIS
     * Confusion matrices
     * Density plots
     * Limitations: SpO2 ๐Ÿ†š SaO2 โžฉ bias + precision
5. RESULTS
     * Misclassification โžฉ 33% of datapoints โžฉ 84% more severe โ–ถ Explanation: Imprecision of

       SpO2 + equation to transform SF to PF
     * High dependence SF on FiO2 settings โžฉ Implications: major TTO + limited capability to

        track severity (<20% events)
     * Severity comparison = 69% โž– individual datapoints = 67%
     * Performance = BEST in more severe PF
          * SF โ†‘ estimated = 28%

          * SF โ†“ estimated = 2.9%

     * Accuracy = different โ†” DBs โžฉ C = second ๐Ÿ†š S = minute ๐Ÿ†š M = hour

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:53:25
Round: 9 01:09:86 Summary
Round: 8 47:47:74 Wrap-up
Round: 7 21:09:56 Tables & Figures
Round: 6 04:51:09 Wrap-up
Round: 5 02:47:08 INTRO
Round: 4 21:58:44 Wrap-up
Round: 3 05:04:28 ART intro + abstract
Round: 2 03:42:78 ART selection
Round: 1 04:55:03 Past JC

2025 NEJM - Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Aneurysmal SAH (English) [R].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

CFR = case fatality rate, DCI = delayed cerebral ischemia, E&D = early & delayed, EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol five-dimension, five-level, FIM = functional independence measure, M_ = mean, RC = red cell, VAS = visual analogue scale


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ SAHARA โžฉ 2025, NEJM, 23_c โž– RCT โž• 742 pxs (โ†’ 725) โž• 12 m โž–

P I C O:
      - P: adults w_ โ€˜acute_aneu_SAH + anemiaโ€™
      - ๐Ÿ…ธ: liberal transfusion (โ‰ค10 g/dL)
      - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: restrictive transfusion (โ‰ค8 g/dL)
      - O:
            * pOC = u๐Ÿง OC12m (โ‰ฅ4 m_Rankin; 0-6)
            * sOC = f_INDEPENDENCE12m (FIM; 18-126) โž• QOL (EQ-5D-5L utility index; -10.1โ€“

              0.95 + VAS; 0-100)
3. EVIDENCE:
      - SAH
            * Condition โžฉ Severe + life-threatening
            * Cause โžฉ early MM + loss of productive life years
            * CFR โžฉ 8-67%
            * Affects โžฉ young + mostly โ™€
            * Clinical course โžฉ complicated by E&D ๐Ÿง  INSULTS
            * Survivors โžฉ <1/3 = full recovery โž– [substantial] = dependent living.
      - โ†“Hb
            * >50% of SAH โ†” worse_clin_OC
            * โ†“DO2 = โ†‘ E&D ๐Ÿง  insults โ†ช aneurysm rupture (DCI) MAJOR contributors โžฉ poor ๐Ÿง 

              recovery.
      - RC Transfusion
            * Limited + conflicting
            * Based on small OBS studies
            * GL โžฉ vague โ“˜
            * Threshold is unknown
4. RESULTS
      - pOC
            * 725pxs (98%)
            * uOC = 122/364 (34%) ๐Ÿ…ธ ๐Ÿ†š 136/361 (38%) ๐Ÿ…ฒ (p=0.22)
      - sOC
            * FIM* = 83 ๐Ÿ…ธ ๐Ÿ†š 80 ๐Ÿ…ฒ
            * EQ-5D-5L* = 0.5 in both
            * VAS* = 52 ๐Ÿ…ธ ๐Ÿ†š 50 ๐Ÿ…ฒ
            * AdvEveโ€  = similar in both

Friday, April 18 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:24:11
Round: 6 10:40:74 Summary with AMA
Round: 5 16:05:19 Wrap-up
Round: 4 43:37:05 Wrap-up + ART intro
Round: 3 07:20:46 ART intro
Round: 2 01:48:24 ART selection
Round: 1 04:39:83 Past JC

Friday, May 9 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, EAM, AAQC

2025 CC - The ventilator of the future_ key principles and unmet needs (marini) [persp].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

๐Ÿซ = lungs, Di = diaphragm, LV = left ventricular, MV = mechanical ventilation, P-SILI = patient self-induced lung injury, RMP = respiratory muscle pump, RR = respiratory rate, TP = transpulmonary, VD = dead space.


1. iMV โžฉ conditioned gas + adequate ventilation energy โžฉ ๐Ÿซ expansion to prevent ATELECTASIS + consequences.
2. iMV allows monitoring:
       * Airway pressures
       * Flows
       * Frequency
       * Vt
3. NEW ADVANCES = Flow delivery patterns + sophisticated online processing
4. Applications in โ€˜PO ventilation + NM weaknessโ€™ โžฉ machine incremental improvements
5. โ€œLess than ideal for the most critically illโ€
6. Technology + engineering โžฉ โ†— capability + safety
7. LIMITATIONS
       * P-SILI
       * Sysinchony
       * Muscle fatigue
       * โ†“ O2
       * Di_DYS
8. Tracking the NET physiologic effect of CV system requires (caregivers): Independent detection + integration.
9. โ expertise and time to spend at the bedside
10. Reaction is OK, but intermittent adjustment + reaction to alarms = dangerous
11. Primary hazards:
       * HD impairment
       * VILI
       * Impairment RMP
12. Insufficient surveillance + complex interactions among organs โžฉ vary w_training + expertise of caregivers = universal PROBLEM.
13. GL not enough
       * Helpful as 1st approximations
       * Imprecise definition of: DIS OR synd + clinical trial.
       * โˆ‘ limit personalization.
14. โ no single set of parameters would suit all patients
15. UNMET GOALS of VENTILATORY support
       * GAS EXCHANGE
             * PAP โžฉ disrupts homeostasis V/Q
             * MV โ†‘ FiO2 + โ†‘ TPaw โžฉ โˆ‘ โœ– atelectasis โ†— O2, PROBLEMS:
                 * โ†‘ Pp โˆ‘HD compromise + ๐Ÿ’ง retention.
                 * Overdistention of aerated ๐Ÿซ zones โžฉ suboptimal reperfusion โˆ‘โ†‘VD
       * HDs
             * โ†‘ intrapleural + โ†’ atrial pressure โžฉ โ†“ venous return + โ†‘ pre-capillary ๐Ÿซ vasculature

                PRESSURE.
             * ATRIAL pressure โžฉ โ†’ ventricle โžฉ LV filling โžฉ โ†“ COโ€ฆ provokes โžฉ Reflex fluid

                loading (caregiver) โžฉ โŠ• fluid balance (compressive forces on alveoli):
                 * Lung edema
                 * Pleural effusion
                 * Ascitis
       * ๐Ÿซ injury
             * VILI โžฉ Tidal repetition excessive tissue strains produced by the energy of ๐Ÿซ

                distension.
             * Extensively investigaged in LABS, less at bedside
             * DIS type, stage and local environment = parenchymal VULNERABILITY (stress

                threshold)
             * HAZARDS = TP airspace pressure (analogue of tissue stress) + power (mechanical

                energy * RR)

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:53:25
Round: 9 01:09:86 Summary
Round: 8 47:47:74 Wrap-up
Round: 7 21:09:56 Tables & Figures
Round: 6 04:51:09 Wrap-up
Round: 5 02:47:08 INTRO
Round: 4 21:58:44 Wrap-up
Round: 3 05:04:28 ART intro + abstract
Round: 2 03:42:78 ART selection
Round: 1 04:55:03 Past JC

2021 Intl J Gynecology Obste - Fetal growth and spontaneous preterm birth in highโ€altitude pregnancy (grant) [srMA].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2021, IJGO, UK โž– srMA โž• 2524, 59 IN โž• -Nov 11, 2020 โž– P I C O:
P: hALT pregnant
๐Ÿ…ธ: preg hALT
๐Ÿ…ฒ: preg non-hALT
O: pOC = hALT impact on LBW, SGA, SPTB | sOC = magnitude LBW
3. EVIDENCE:
   - โ€ฆ
4. METHODS.
   - ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
   - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
   - RANDOM โž 
   - INTERV โž 
5. RESULTS
6. RATIONALE

7. LIMITATIONS

Friday, May 2 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

BLAS, HIBN, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:19:21
Round: 3 59:56:38 The rest
Round: 2 01:59:03 ART selection
Round: 1 17:26:31 Past JC

April, 2025

Friday, May 23 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, AHO, BAH, GMC, HIBN, AAQC

2025 CC - โ€œThe NET effectโ€ Neutrophil extracellular trapsโ€”a potential key component of the dysregulated host immune response in sepsis (retter)[r].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (MAAT)

Glossary: 

Com = complement, coa_factors = coagulation factors, DAMPs = damage-associated molecular patterns, M = monocytes, N = neutrophils, OD = organ dysfunction, PLT = platelets, PRRs = pattern recognition receptors, ROS = reactive oxygen species.


1. Sepsis definition
2. 11M deaths per year โž• 49M cases
3. Advancements โžฉ Sโ€ข immunobiology = โ†—๏ธ nuanced conceptualization (resistance, tolerance,

    resilience, resolution, repair)
4. Immunothrombosis โžฉ immune โž• coagulation โžฉ to โœ– pathogens
         * โŠ• cellular + molecular โžฉ N, PLT, M, com, DAMPs, coa_factors
         * โŠ• excesive + uncontrolled โžฉ thromboinflammation
5. DAMPs โžฉ danger signals โ–ถ triggers INFLAMMATORY RESPONSES thought PRRs:
          * TLR
          * NOD
6. โ†‘ DAMPs โžฉ amplifies + perpetuates ๐Ÿ“ˆINFLAMMATION โžฉ Sโ€ข + OD
7. NETs โžฉ histones + granular proteins โžฉ TRAPS
8. โ†‘ FORMATION ยฑ DYSREGULATED clearance โžฉ pathophysiology of Sโ€ข + thrombosis
9. N โžฉ short lifespan = 5-7d โžฉ โ†“ once ACTIVATED:
          - (+) rapid response to INF
          - (-) obstacle to research (isolate cells + expand โžฉ in vitro)
          - Few hours life AFTER ISOLATION
          - Triggers: PROCESSES โžฉ degranulation + ROS
10. N requires PLT + M to get activated (makes it harder to study in vitro)
11. N have different PHENOTYPES + PROFILES (functionals) โžฉ still being explored.
12. Not only affect BLOODSTREAM, but also TISSUES
13. Sophisticated techniques are needed (not universally available). E.g. intravital microscopy
14. Ethical and technical CONSIDERATIONS make it difficult to study in humans.
15. 2004. Brinkmann โžฉ nuclear content โžฉ traps + kill bacteria โžฉ scepticism (short-lived

      concept challenged)
16. 2007. Fuchs โžฉ net formation was triggered by NETosis (active cell detah) โžฉ requires ROS

      by NADPH.
17. NEt release โŠ• stimuli:
          - Bacteria
          - Viruses
          - Fungi
          - Parasites

          - Pro-inflammatory mediators: IL8, lymphotoxin-alpha

Friday, May 16 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, HIBN, AAQC

2025 JAMA - Metformin for Knee Osteoarthritis in Pxs W_ Overweight or Obesity (pan) [RCT].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

ACR = American College of Rheumatology, AMPK = Adenosine Monophosphateโ€“Activated Protein Kinase, ES = Effect Size, ๐Ÿ’‰ = Intravenous, OA = Osteoarthritis, VAS = Visual Analog Scale..


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, JAMA, AUS โž– par_db_RCT โž• 54 ๐Ÿ†š 53 โž•6m of intervention โ€“ total 2y (2021 to 2023), last f-up Feb 2024 โž– P I C O:
    - P: symp_knee OSTEOARTHRITIS + overweight OR obesity
    - ๐Ÿ…ธ: metformin 2g/d
    - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: placebo
    - O: pOC = change in knee pain (VAS) | sOC = WOMACS + AQoL
3. EVIDENCE:
    - Preclinical + preliminary โžฉ โ†“ inflammation โž• preserves cartilage โž• โ†— knee pain
    - OA IN 365M
    - Knee OA โžฉ โ†‘ weight joints, inflammation, imp_GLU & LIP metabolism โ–ถ SYST

      inflammation + oxidative stress + metabolic DYS in JOINT TISSUES (cartilage degradation

      + DIS progression)
    - METFORMIN >60y known as 1st line for DM
    - SAFE, inexpensive, well-tolerated biguanide
    - โ†“ liver_GLU production โž• โ†“ IR โž• โ†“ ENDOGENOUS hyperINSULINEMIA
    - Modest weight loss โž• โ†“ inflammation (w_ & wo_DM)
    - PLEIOTROPIC EFFECTS: โ†“ knee pain in OA
       * Inflammatory properties
       * โ†‘ GLU & LIP metabolism โžฉ โ†‘ โŠ• AMPk
4. METHODS.
    - ๐—œ๐—ก โž  pain (>4/10 VAS) โž• BMI โ‰ฅ25 โž• >40yo โž• โ‰ฅ6m painโž• know OA by criteria ACR
    - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž  sev_Xray knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4) โž• Severe knee pain (>80 mm

      VAS) โž• Inflammatory arthritis โž• Significant knee injury โž• DM โž• Knee surgery (past

      year or next 6 m) โž• Intra-articular hyaluronic acid ๐Ÿ’‰ (past 6 m) โž• Corticosteroid ๐Ÿ’‰

      (past 3 m) โž• investigational drug or device (30d prior to randomization) โž• Conditions

      affecting lower limb function (NEURO disorders, stroke) โž• โ™พ & liver IMPAIRMENT.
    - RANDOM โž  contacted by website, email, phone โž•local and social media

      advertisements.
    - Physical examination not performed by a physician โžฉ participants reported KNEE         

      CREPITUS + TENDERNESS + WARMT + bony enlargement โœ–
    - INDEX KNEE:
       * The symptomatic OA knee
       * IF both SYMP + eligible VAS โžฉ โ†‘VAS โœ”
       * If pain levels = โžฉ less severe Xray โœ”
       * IF both identical โžฉ dominant โœ”
    - INTERV โž  Telemedicine (remote follow-up)
    - DESIGNS: Originally 2 studies โž• 2 ethical committees โž• funding only for study 1   

      โž•CONSORT
5. RESULTS
    - pOC:
       * ๐Ÿ…ธ โ†“ 31.3 mm ๐Ÿ…ฒ โ†“ 18.9 mm
       * ES: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.83); P = .01
    - sOC โ€“ WOMAC Scores:
       * Pain Subscale โžฉ ๐Ÿ…ธ : โ†“ 113.9 ๐Ÿ…ฒ : โ†“ 68.2 โž– Adjusted DIFF: โ€“42.4 (95% CI: โ€“83.9 to โ€“

         1.0); P = .045
       * Stiffness Subscale โžฉ ๐Ÿ…ธ : โ†“ 56.9 ๐Ÿ…ฒ : โ†“ 26.7 โž– Adjusted DIFF: โ€“23.0 (95% CI: โ€“40.4 to โ€“

         5.7); P = .01
      * Function Subscale โžฉ ๐Ÿ…ธ : โ†“ 426.1 ๐Ÿ…ฒ : โ†“ 221.7 โž– Adjusted DIFF: โ€“179.8 (95% CI: โ€“313.0 

        to โ€“46.6); P = .009
    - oOC
       * AQoL-8D โžฉ 0.01 (95% CI: โ€“0.02 to 0.05); P = .47
       * OMERACT-OARSI Responder โžฉ ๐Ÿ…ธ : 65% responders ๐Ÿ…ฒ : 45% responders โžฉ OR: 2.21 

         (95% CI: 0.92 to 5.31); P = .07
       * VAS Change 3m โžฉ DIFF: โ€“2.5 mm (95% CI: โ€“11.7 to 6.6 mm); P = .58

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:44:07
Round: 6 00:22:58 Comment
Round: 5 54:52:26 Wrap-up + analysis
Round: 4 30:43:87 Abstract + intro
Round: 3 06:51:44 ART selection
Round: 2 09:40:43 Past JC

June, 2025

Friday, June 20 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, HIBN, AAQC

2024 NEJM - Case 22-2024 A 30-Year-Old Woman w_ Postpartum Fever, Abdominal Pain + Skin Ulcers (Merola) [cr].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ = abdomen = abdominal


1. โ™€ 30yo โžฉ SYMP = fever + ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝpain
2. H+ 6d af_DELIVERY | 35w + colonization B streptococcus (vancomycin) + spontaneous rupture membranes + 8h later: infant of 3,5Kg, large for gestational age.
3. 4d af_DELIVERY โžฉ mild diffuse ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ & PELVIC cramping + vaginal bleeding (clots).
4. Admission โžฉ fever + chills
          - Inguinal area w_bumps (small + painful), drained blood & pus
          - Leg swelling (abated since childbirth)
5. CLINICS โžฉ
          - T 38,7 โž• BP 125/80
          - Erythematous pustules drained yellow, purulent fluid (right inguinal area)
          - Scarring (left inguinal area)
          - LEU 22,9
          - Blood and cervical cultures
6. HISTORY
          - Epiploic appendagitis 10w before ADM
          - Acetaminophen + ibuprofen for ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ pain
          - Amoxicillin + cephalexin = caused HIVES
          - Father and paternal grandfather โžฉ arthritis
          - Brother โžฉ Crohnโ€™s disease
          - Brother โžฉ neurofibromatosis
7. CT Abdomen & pelvis
          - Normal
          - Mild adjacent fat
8. INFECTO
          - Genta + clinda
          - Endometritis
          - Fever + ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ pain + โ†‘ LEU
          - Vanco on D3
          - Cefepime on D4 (once = TEST DOSE) โžฉ โœ” โžฉ genta + clinda โœ–
          - Vanco + cefepime + metro
9. PATHOLOGY
          - D6, biopsy โžฉ neutrophilic debris (dense neutrophilic infiltrate)
10. MRI
          - Angio MRI โžฉ ascitis + anasarca
          - 4D later โžฉ โ†‘ ascitis + anasarca โžฉ 2 new fluid collections
             * Left parametrical 6.3
             * Right uterocervical junction 3.2
11. INFECTO
          - Cefepime + metro โœ–
          - Vanco โœ” + MERO (due to fever)
          - Catheter into left parametrial fluid collection (20mL purulent fluid) drained โžฉ cultures no

            growth
12. CLINICS
          - D11. SpO2 86% AA โž• O2 2L โžฉ โ†—๏ธ SpO2 91%
          - T 36,7, BP 109/58, HR 112 (regular), RR 24
          - Tired and ill
          - Marked jugular venous distention
          - Scant purulent drainage (percutaneous catheter)
          - Anasarca โž• symmetric 1+ ankle edema
13. LABS
          - Inflammation clearly shown
          - Biventricular ok, right atrium and right ventricle DILATED + septum flattened d_dyas -   

            pulmonary arteries DILATED
14. IMAGENO
          - No PE, yes sub segmental atelectasis
          - โ†‘ ascitis and anasarca
          - Splenomegaly + hepatomegaly
          - Collection resolved
          - Right remained unchanged
          - Liver enzymes ABNORMAL โžฉ cholangiopancreatography = multiple intrahepatic fluid

            collections = hyperintensty T2-wighted
15. D12.
          - Plaques โžฉ in the peripheral IV catheter
          - Bulla โžฉ left abdominal wall
          - Plaques โžฉ ulcerated
          - New skin lesions โžฉ Right inguinal crease and mons pubis
16. Next 2 days
          - Bulla โžฉ ulcerated
          - Another lesion in percutaneous drainage catheter
          - โ†‘ area & depth โžฉ left upper arm, right inguinal crease, mons pubis
          - Furosemide
          - Vanco โœ– , mero โœ” , DAPTOMICIN + MICAFUNGIN started
17. DIFFERENTIAL

          - Hepatobiliar source โžฉ โ†‘ ALK Phosp โž• GGT

          - Biopsy does not allow us to exclude ENDOMETRITIS

          - Fungal + mycobacterial INF should be considered โžฉ empirical ATB without results +

            new collections + โ†‘ HR + โ†‘ RR + โ†‘ hypoxemia + negative cultures

Friday, June 13 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, MAAT, AAQC

2025 EHJ - Heart rate-lowering drugs+outcomes in HTA+CVD a MA (Sanidas) [RCT].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

CHD = Coronary heart disease, MACE = Major CV events, MI = myocardial infarction, Sโ€  = Stroke.


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, EHJ, GR โž– srMA โž• 74 RCT (>150k pxs) โž• - July 2024 โž– P I C O:
   - P: HTA ยฑ CVD
   - ๐Ÿ…ธ: HRโ†“ over 2,7y
   - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: PLACEBO + less intense TTO
   - O:
       1. CHD (Coronary โ€  โž• Non-fatal MI
       2. Sโ€  (Fatal โž• Non-fatal)
       3. Hยบ-HF (Hยบ d_ HF) 
       4. MACE (Composite: Sโ€  + CHD)
       5. Expanded composite CV events (Composite: Sโ€  โž• CHD โž• HF or MACE)
       6. CVโ€ 
       7. acMM
       8. AdvEve w_ TTO โœ‹๐Ÿฝ (Serious AdvEve โ†’ permanent TTO โœ‹๐Ÿฝ)
3. EVIDENCE:
- โ€ฆ
4. METHODS.
- ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
       โ€ข RCTs w_ parallel design
       โ€ข On-TTO ฦ’-up โ‰ฅ6m
       โ€ข HR ฮ” between arms: โ‰ฅ2 b.p.m.
       โ€ข Trials where:
       โ€ข HRโ†“ ๐Ÿ†š non-HR-lowering agents
       โ€ข More- ๐Ÿ†š less- intense HR-lowering agents
       โ€ข Non-intended HR ฮ” โ‰ฅ2 b.p.m. occurred
       โ€ข HRโ†“ randomized on background of other HRโ†“ therapies or added per protocol
       โ€ข Any comorbidities, incl. AF or CKD (incl. dialysis)
- ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
       โ€ข HR ฮ” <2 b.p.m. between arms
       โ€ข Cross-over designs
       โ€ข Sub-studies of main trials
       โ€ข Trials wo_ HR data d_ ฦ’-up
       โ€ข Trials <6 mo ฦ’-up

       โ€ข Trials w_ <5 total events

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:49:03
Round: 6 15:51:49 Comment
Round: 5 51:28:43 Method
Round: 4 19:10:37 intro
Round: 3 12:18:10 ART abstract
Round: 2 04:23:64 ART selection
Round: 1 05:51:08 Last JC

July, 2025

Friday, July 18 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

MASP, AAQC

2025 ICM - Metabolic septic shock sub phenotypes, stability over time+association w_ clinical OC (Antcliffe) [R].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

 โ€  = deaths, HC = hydrocortisone, ID = identification, MEDs = medications, ML = machine learning, PLA = placebo, VP = vasopressin


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, ICM, UK โž– 2_db_RT โž• LeoPARDS (<1,5k samples, >400pxs) & VANISH (<500 samples, >170 pxs) โž• LeoPARDS (Jan 2014 - Dec 2015) & VANISH (Feb 2013 - May 2015) โž– P I C O:
   - P: Sร˜ metabolic clusters
   - ๐Ÿ…ธ: serum at 4 time points โ€“ LeoPARDS = derivation โž• VANISH = validation.
   - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: NA
   - O: pOC = MM | sOC = cluster membership โ†” 28d_OC โž• SOFA mean tatal โž• interaction

     โ€œtrial TTO โ†” baseline cluster membershipโ€ on OC
3. EVIDENCE.
   - Sโ€ข โžฉ 11M โ€  per year โž• 20% of global โ€ 
   - TTO limited โžฉ failure is due to HETEROGENEITY
   - ML was applied to make progress on TECHNIQUES to biological data:
         * Gene expression
         * Inflammatory proteins.
   - Questions are:
         * Are sub-phenotypes stable?
         * Is transition โ†” sub-phenotypes are predictable of OC?

   - Metabolomics โžฉ measurement of small molecules โ†’ host โ†” environment (encapsulate

     wide range of origins: genome, proteome, pathogen)

   - Many studies exposed DX, prognosis and pathogen ID in Sโ€ข

   - Few studies used metabolois to ID Sโ€ข sub-phenotypes (DEF: not apparent to clinicians + 

     note yet validated)
   - MEDs used in Sโ€ข (vasopressin, levosimendan, glucocorticoids) could show heterogeneity of

     TTO based on px METABOLIC profiles.
4. METHODS.
   - ๐—œ๐—ก โž  Sโ€ข + 6h vasopressor โžฉ randomized to VP or NE, followed by HC or PLA (last 2 given

     ONLY if max infusion of the 1st study drug was reached)
   - RANDOM โž  Hierarchical, k-means, consensus clustering โžฉ applied to ID โ€œmetabolic sub-

     phenotypesโ€:
      * 70% derivation (LeoPARD)
      * 30% validation (VANISH)
5. RESULTS.

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:49:26
Round: 4 03:39:44 Comments
Round: 3 01:31:22 ART
Round: 2 08:02:32 ART selection
Round: 1 06:22:58 Past JC


   - The 3 metabolic subgroups EVOLVE over time 
   - Low lysophospholipid sub-phenotypes โ†” โ†‘ MM
   - Monitoring could help ID:

         * pxs at r_poor_OC

         * Direct novel therapies (lysophospholipid supplementation)

August, 2025

Friday, August 15 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, MASP, HIBN,  AAQC

2025 NEJM - A Randomized Trial of Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution in Cardiac Surgery (monaco) [R].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

ACIP = CDC Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, ANH = acute normovolemic hemodilution, ARC = allogenic red-cell tranfusion, COR = class of recommendation, CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass, IO = intraoperative, LOE = level of evidence, NA = North America, TACO = transfusion-associated circulatory overload, TRALI = transfusion-related lung injury, UC = usual care, ๐Ÿฆ  = infections, ๐Ÿคง = allergic reactions, ๐Ÿฅถ = chills, ๐ŸŒก๏ธ = fever.



1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ 2025, NEJM, IT โž– mn_sb_prag_RCT โž• 32 centers, 11 countries (NA, SA, EU,      ASIA) โž• โ€ฆ โž– P I C O:
     - P: ๐Ÿซ€ Sx w_CPB
     - ๐Ÿ…ธ: ANH
     - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: usual care (ARC)
     - O: pOC = transfusion of โ‰ฅ1 unit of ARC | sOC = ac_MM30 af_Sx OR d_H+ โž• bleeding

       complications โž• ischemic โž• AKI.
3. EVIDENCE.
      a. 10M of RCU transfused (USA) per year
      b. 3 main concerns: costs โž• shortages โž• transfusion-related complications
      c. COST โžฉ $150 - $634 per unit (country dependent).
      d. AVAILABILITY โžฉ fluctuates over time w_periods of shortages โ–ถ๏ธŽ postponement of

          nonurgent Sx
      e. DELAYS โžฉ affect: px health โž• costs
      f. RISKS โžฉ mild๐ŸŒก๏ธ, ๐Ÿฅถ, ๐Ÿคง, ๐Ÿฆ , TRALI, TACO (1-5%)
      g. ๐Ÿซ€ Sx anually (worldwide) โ–ถ๏ธŽ >2M pxs โž– 35% receive โ‰ฅ1 URC
      h. ANH โ–ถ๏ธŽ 20% ๐Ÿซ€ Sx (USA) โž• 27% ๐Ÿซ€ anesthesiologists โž• 14% pxs wordwide. (before

          heparin + CPB)
         i. RETROSPECTIVE โžฉ 18k pxs, USA, ๐Ÿซ€Sx โžฉ OCs:
           i. ANH only (LOWEST % of IO transfusion)
           ii. retrograde autologous priming only
           iii. both
           iv. neither
      j. MA โžฉ 29 RCT, ๐Ÿซ€Sx, USA + 10 others โžฉ โ†“ need of URC w_ANH โ–ถ๏ธŽ $magnified$ when

         โ‰ฅ650mL was withdrawn preOP.
      k. MA โžฉ RCTs โ–ถ๏ธŽ ANH = โ†“ % pxs โž• โ†“ number URC.
      l. GL 2021 ACP * ANH is a reasonable method to reduce bleeding and transfusion
      m. GL 2024 EU ** ANH may be considered to reduce postoperative transfusions   

           (LOE A, COR IIb)
      n. Consensus statement โ–ถ๏ธŽ studies were underpowered to assess SAFETY + HD

           procedures varied among studies.
4. METHODS.
      - ๐—œ๐—ก โž  low-dose aspirin was permitted.
      - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž  unstable CAD โž• critical periOP state โž• ER Sx โž• inadequate DC antiCOAG or

         antiPLAT. 2nd screening โžฉ r_HD instability OR anemia af_ANH.
      - RANDOM โž  Web-based system, computer generated, permuted-block sequences,

        w_stratification (sites).
      - INTERV โž  โ‰ฅ650mL of whole blood w_crystalloid replacement if needed.
          - 3mL of crystalloids / 1mL withdrawal, stored, reinfused.
          - heparin reversed w_protamine
          - Withdrawn w_large-bore, central, rapid-infusion catheter
          - Thresholds: <28% โ† CPB, <20% d_CPB, <25% immediately af_CPB weaning, <27%

             d_PO H+ stay.
          - If anemic โ† or d_ANH = transfusion (anesthesiologist)
      - BLINDED โ–ถ๏ธŽ pxs, investigators, data collectors, OC assessors, statisticians.
5. RESULTS.
      - 2010 randomized โžฉ 1010 ANH ๐Ÿ†š 1000 UC
      - One ARC โ–ถ๏ธŽ 27% ANH ๐Ÿ†š 29% UC (p=0.34)
      - Bleeding โ–ถ๏ธŽ 4% ANH ๐Ÿ†š 3% UC
      - MM30 โ–ถ๏ธŽ 1,4% ANH ๐Ÿ†š 1,6% UC

      - Safety โ–ถ๏ธŽ were SIMILAR in both

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
02:19:33
Round: 5 00:58:20 Close
Round: 4 01:14:45 Wrap-up
Round: 3 53:46:91 Reading + notes
Round: 2 04:03:97 ART selection
Round: 1 05:58:64 Past JC

Friday, August 8 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

AMA, AHO, RAH, HIBN, YZE, AAQC

2025 JAMA - The CDC No Longer Recommends C19 Shots During Pregnancy Now What (rubin) [mn].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

ACIP = CDC Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, VAX = vaccines, VRBPAC = FDAโ€™s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.


1. Kennedy โ–ถ๏ธŽ announced he had removed C19 vax for: healthy children + pregnant โ™€

    (video in X)
2. Kennedy = founder and former chair of antivaccine organization Childrenโ€™s Health Defense.
3. NIH + FDA had repesentatives, BUT no one from the CDC.
4. No one explain why the annoucement. (the rationale)
5. Confusing โžฉ people involved publisehd a week earlier โžฉ NEJM = CDC list of undelying

    ondicions that โ†‘r_sC19: pregnancy + recent pregnancy.
6. 4 weeks after the announcement โžฉ ACIP (created in 1964) 1st meeting EMPHASIZED โ–ถ๏ธŽ

    IMP C19 vax d_pregnancy.
7. MacNeil (CDC respiratory viruses Branch) โ–ถ๏ธŽ vax protect pregnant โ™€ + infants + severe DIS
8. 17 panelists from ACIP were fired before the announcement. The new ones did not note the

    CONTRADICTION with the epimedio data.
9. Medical profesional independent groups started to develop + promote their OWN โ˜…
10. VRBPAC โ–ถ๏ธŽ May 22 = continue C19 VAX during fall โž• TARGET JN.1 (or on of its

      descendants). Asked to manufacture monovalent + JN.1-lineage based VAX.
11. Brewer โ–ถ๏ธŽ one of the 17 fired ACIP panelists โžฉ โwe need to vaccinate pregnant women to

      protect those kids and protect the pregnancy itself.
12. ACIP agenda โžฉ 3 regular meeting yearly: August, September, October.
13. Panagiotakopoulos โ–ถ๏ธŽ decided to quit, worked for 12 yearsโ€ฆ did not agree with the

      announcement.
14. Access โž• insurance are AFFECTED. (pharmacist wonโ€™t vaccinate even if you want it)
15. Riley (laison: ACOG โ†” ACIP) โ–ถ๏ธŽ reviewed new vaxโ€™s safety METICULOUSLY with her team

      โžฉ makes her angry โ€œโ€ฆ. biased in our deliberationsโ€.
16. Muรฑoz (laison: IDSA โ†” ACIP) โ–ถ๏ธŽ did not attend, either online.
17. Anyhow, new ACIP voted:
   a. clesrovimab โžฉ newly approved anti-RSV mAb โžฉ <8m (mothers not vax)
   b. flu vax without thimerosal โžฉ โ‰ฅ6m
   c. thimerosal-free flu vax โžฉ โ™€ + children + adolescents through 18yo.

18. Many antiVAX groups are taking advantage of the situation. 19. Gorham โ–ถ๏ธŽ โ lives are at

      risk, and decades of public health and trust are being actively and carelessly undermined.โ€

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
02:29:16
Round: 10 02:13:20 Comments
Round: 9 29:43:66 Wrap-up
Round: 8 22:37:99 Analysis
Round: 7 28:44:28 Reading + notes
Round: 6 06:07:19 Reading + notes
Round: 5 30:40:10 Analysis
Round: 4 06:44:94 Reading + notes
Round: 3 07:54:37 ART selection
Round: 2 00:20:40 Comments
Round: 1 14:10:54 Past JC

Friday, August 29 , 2025 at 18h30 at BO - 23h30 at BE

JJFM, MASP, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
02:29:16
Round: 10 02:13:20 Comments
Round: 9 29:43:66 Wrap-up
Round: 8 22:37:99 Analysis
Round: 7 28:44:28 Reading + notes
Round: 6 06:07:19 Reading + notes
Round: 5 30:40:10 Analysis
Round: 4 06:44:94 Reading + notes
Round: 3 07:54:37 ART selection
Round: 2 00:20:40 Comments
Round: 1 14:10:54 Past JC

2025 JAMA - Higher Educational Attainment and Accelerated Tau Accumulation in Alzheimer Disease (cai) [R].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: 

๐Ÿง  = brain
๐Ÿซ = lungs
๐Ÿซ€ = heart
๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ = abdomen = abdominal
โ™พ๏ธ = kidneys = renal
๐Ÿฉธ= blood = hematology
๐Ÿชฒ = infections
๐Ÿ’จ = flow
โžฐ = pressure
๐Ÿค“ = analysis;
โšก๏ธ = cardiac arrest;
๐Ÿ“ˆ = arrhythmia;
๐Ÿ—ฃ = suggestion(s)

โ˜… = recommendation(s)

AD = Alzheimer disease;

TTO = treatment

AรŸ = amiloid beta (รŸ)

h_EA = high educational attainment


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, JAMA, CH โž– analysis_3cohort โž• 887 = >350 (ADNI), <400 (A4),

    >100 (GHABS) โž• -Nov 11, 2020 โž– P I C O:
   - P: adults
      - AรŸโŠ• & AรŸโŠ–
      - ADNI 73yo | A4 72yo | GHABS 66yo
   - ๐Ÿ…ธ: h_EA
   - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: l_EA
   - O:pOC = tau changes | sOC =
      1. interactions w_aรŸburden โž• entorhinal tau โž• p-tau217 (AรŸโŠ•)
      2. Connectivity-associated tau spread (AรŸ/EA groups)
      3. Treatment attenuated tau accumulation (AรŸโŠ• h_EA)
3. EVIDENCE.
   a. AรŸ plaques + neurofibrillary tau tangles:
       i. AD hallmarks.
       ii. PET detected
   b.Lista
4. METHODS.
   - ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
   - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
   - RANDOM โž 
   - INTERV โž 
5. RESULTS.
   a. AรŸโŠ– โžฉ `tau accumulation:`h_EA < l_EA (*p=.03*)
   b. AรŸโŠ•:
      i. `Tau accumulation:` h_EA > l_EA (*p=.03*)
          1. AรŸ-associated (*p=.006*)
          2. Tau-associated (*p=.01*)
          3. p-tau217-associated (*p=.04*)
          4. connectivity-associated (p=.048)
   c. AรŸ-targeting TTO โžฉ mitigated p-tau217-associated (AD+h_EA) (*p<.001*)
   d. โˆ‘ โžฉ h_EA โ†” faster `tau accumulation` โž• `spread in AรŸ โŠ•`
6. RATIONALE.
   a. In AD & h_EA โžฉ AรŸ clearance is IMP to โ†“ `tau progression`

7. LIMITATIONS.

September, 2025

Saturday, September 13, 2025 at 00:30:23 in BE

AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
49:54:14

Round: 3 35:51:43 Read + notes

Round: 2 04:06:18 Selection

Round: 1 09:56:51 Past JC

2025 JAMA - Systemic Strategies to Prevent Nonbeneficial Treatments Near the End of Life (weiss) [R].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: A4 = Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimerโ€™s Disease study, AรŸ = amiloid beta (รŸ), AD = Alzheimer disease, ADNI = Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, GHABS = Greater-Bay-Area Healthy Aging Brain Study, h_EA = high educational attainment, l_EA = low educational attainment, TTO = treatment.


1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:

2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, JAMA, USA-GB โž– qual_semiStruc_in-depth_ITW โž• 1 NHS โž• Feb 2021 - 2023 โž– P I C O:

- P: caregivers surveys
- ๐Ÿ…ธ: 13 clinicians + 14 caregivers
- ๐Ÿ…ฒ: NA
- O: pOC = individual-, institutional-, system-level FACTORS that affect TTO escalation decisions among PLWD

3. EVIDENCE.

- โ€ฆ

4. METHODS.

- ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
- ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
- RANDOM โž 
- INTERV โž 

5. RESULTS.

- Institutional-level factors โ–ถ๏ธŽ protocols, resources, practices
- System-level factors โ–ถ๏ธŽ national policies, laws, cultural norms

6. RATIONALE.

7. LIMITATIONS.

October, 2025

Friday, October 3, 2025 at 12:31:09 in BE

EMS, AMA, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
02:29:16

Round: 5 00:58:20 Close
Round: 4 01:14:45 Wrap-up
Round: 3 53:46:91 Reading + notes
Round: 2 04:03:97 ART selection
Round: 1 05:58:64 Past JC

2025 NEJMcd - Choice of Intravenous Fluid for Resuscitation in DKA (Li).pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary:โ˜… = recommendation(s), 0.9% NS = normal saline = isotonic saline, GL = guidelines, HD = hemodynamic, HOITS = hyperosmolarity-induced transcellular shift, INS = insuline, LR = lactated Ringerโ€™s, VOL = volume.


1. 24yo โ™€, T1DM, ER, 1d_H
2. Nausea + ๐Ÿคฎ + ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ pain
3. Did not take INS โžฉ 28UI glargine nights + 8 UI lispro w_meals
4. VIT: 36,5ยบC, 98/51, 107, 20, 98% (AA)
5. EXAM: dry mucous membranes + โ†“ skin turgor + ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ no pain
6. LAB: crea 1,6 โž– Na 131 โž– K 5,7 โž– HCO3 10 โž– anion GAP 28 โž– GLU 372 โž– pH       7,26 โž– B-OH-butyrate 5,1 โž– HbA1c 8.7%.
7. DX: DKA
8. INS infusion STARTED โž• px to MED floor.
9. EVIDENCE:
    a. Most GL โ˜… 0.9% NS in DKA
    b. Recent studies ๐Ÿ—ฃ balanced crystalloids (LR) โžฉ FASTER RESOLUTION
10. 1st expert = Bassem MIKHAEL (balanced crystalloids)
    a. Case: hypovolemia โž• metabolic acidosis
    b. TTO: rapid expansion of intravascular compartment (HD resuscitation) โž• metabolic disturbances
    c. Renal impairment โžฉ + โ†‘K = warrants use of NS
        i. Urinary K excretion โ†” distal tubular Na delivery (compared to LR)

             > if โ†‘ Na given to the tubule, โ†‘ K excretion
             >
        ii. DKA โžฉ โ†‘K is: transient โž• sec. to โ†‘HOITS

       iii. INS will RAPIDLY reverse the shift (HOITS)

November, 2025

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
02:29:16

Round: 5 00:58:20 Close
Round: 4 01:14:45 Wrap-up
Round: 3 53:46:91 Reading + notes
Round: 2 04:03:97 ART selection
Round: 1 05:58:64 Past JC

2025 ICM - ESICM guidelines on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring[Monnet) [GL]

Glossary: โ˜… = recommendation(s), โšก๏ธ = cardiac arrest, ๐Ÿค“ = analysis, ๐Ÿ“ˆ = arrhythmia, ๐Ÿ—ฃ = suggestion(s), ๐Ÿฉธ = blood = hematology, ๐Ÿชฒ = infections, ๐Ÿ’จ = flow, โžฐ = pressure, ๐Ÿง  = brain, ๐Ÿซ = lungs, ๐Ÿซ€ = heart, ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ = abdomen = abdominal, โ™พ๏ธ = kidneys = renal, ยง = shock, AMes = Antonio Messina, CO = cardiac output, CRT = capillary refill time, CVC = central venous catheter, DX = diagnosis, DYS = dysfunction, FR = fluid responsiveness, GC = Giacomo Coppalini, INO = inotropic, JB = Jan Bakker, MCS = mechanical circulatory support, MECHS = mechanisms, MG = Massimiliano Greco, MNT = monitoring, MSa = Marzia Savi, OH = Oliver Hunsicker, orgPER = organ perfusion, PvaCO2 = veno-arterial difference in CO2, ROB = risk of bias, ScvO2 = central venous oxygen saturation, SV = stroke volume, TK = Thomas Kaufmann, Tยบ = temperature, UGPS = ungraded good practice statements, XM = Xavier Monnet.CAP = community-acquired pneumonia.



1. 1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, ICM, EUR โž– GL โž• 50 โ˜… โž• -2024 (2014 update) โž– P I C O:
     - P: shock pxs
     - ๐Ÿ…ธ: 4 domains: definition (JB) + fluids (AMes) + HD monitoring (XM) + echo (MCh)
     - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: NA
     - O: pOC = DX + MNT of ยง
3. EVIDENCE.
    a. State of acute circulatory failure + 4 basic MECHS:
        i. โ†“ VOL
        ii. ๐Ÿซ€ 
        iii. obstructive
        iv. distributive
    b. Unifying pathological process:
        i. โ†“ O2 supply
        ii. โ†“ cell O2 uptake
    c. MM from ยง ๐ŸŸฐ 20 - 50%
    d. ยงmm โžฉ timely + evaluation:
        i. presence
        ii. mechs
        iii. cause
        iv. plan
        v. intervention โžฉ โ†‘ orgPER + O2
          1. FR
          2. VP
          3. INO
          4. MCS
4. METHODS.
     - INTERV โž  PICO-formatted questions + GRADE + UGPS
          - Chairs: XM, MCh
          - 24 panelists: # scientific publications + gender balance
          - NEXT members: OH, TK
          - Methodologist: MG + MSa & GC: data extraction + synthesis + ROB
5. RESULTS.
     a. CRT โœ”๏ธŽ w_skin Tยบ + mottling
     b. IF w_CVC: (UGPS)
         i. Serial S(c)vO2
         ii. โˆ† PvaCO2
     c. IF w_persistent ยง (af_initial fluids)
         i. FR should be assessed โ† continuing FR (UGPS)
         ii. โœ”๏ธŽ Dynamic variables | โœ–๏ธŽ static markers โžฉ of preload for predicting FR, WHEN APPLICABLE (GRADED STATEMENT)
     d. CO ยฑ SV โžฉ IF no response to initial therapy (UGPS)
     e. AL โžฉ IF no response to initial therapy ยฑ requiring VP infusion (UGPS)
     f. ECHO:
         i. 1st modality โ€“ type of ยง

         ii. Defined phenotypes of โ† + โ†’ ventricular DYS

Friday, November 28, 2025 at 17:15:54 in BE

MASP, AAQC

Friday, November 21, 2025 at 20:22:32 in BE

MLHG, AMA, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:42:12

Round: 6 20:20:16 Comments
Round: 5 55:50:44 Intro + wrap-up
Round: 4 16:43:50 Wrap-up
Round: 3 05:05:24 Interpretation + wrap-up (abstract)
Round: 2 02:55:41 Reading + notes (abstract)

Round: 1 01:17:92 ART selection

2025 NEJM - SONIA, A Pragmatic Trial of Glucocorticoids f_ CAP (Lucinde) [RCT].pdf

Codified  by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (ABFL)

Glossary: โ˜… = recommendation(s), LRS = low-resource setting, HRS = high-resource setting, SC = standard of care, GC = glucocorticoids, MM30 = mortality at 30d, ACIP = CDC Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, CAP = community-acquired pneumonia.



1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, NEJM, Kenya (18H+) โž– prag_ol_RCT โž• >2k (~1k each group) โž• April 2022 - June 2024 โž– P I C O:
     - P:Adults w_sev_CAP (53yo)
     - ๐Ÿ…ธ: adjunctive glucocorticoids (f_10d)
     - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: standard care
     - O: pOC = MM30
3. EVIDENCE.
      a. GC โ†“ MM in sev_CAP in WELL-RESOURCED settings.
      b. In LRS IT IS UNCLEAR (risks + benefits)
      c. Case-fatality โžฉ **3-5x** more than high-income settings (despite younger age)
      d. 2 recent studies:
          i. Meduri, ICM 2024 โžฉ methylprednisolone
          ii. Dequin, NEJM 2023 โžฉ hydrocortisone
          iii. srMA โžฉ ICU โžฉ โ†“ MM
          iv. NO BENEFIT from other studies.
          v. Studies are done in older people + excluding HIV + TBC.
          vi. Delayed presentation to a H+ โžฉ โ†“ effectiveness (early GC TTO is needed )
          vii. โ†“ DX capacity โžฉ to stratigy pxs (LRS)
          viii. Studies were done in the ICU - NONE in non-ICU looking at MM.
4. METHODS.
     - ๐—œ๐—ก โž  โ‰ฅ18yo + CAP + UNCLEAR indication of GC.
     - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
     - CAP defined as โ‰ฅ signs + symptoms:
         - <14d
         - cough, fever, dyspnea, hemoptysis,
chest pain, or crackles
         - <48h af_H+ admission
    - RANDOM โž 
    - INTERV โž 
5. RESULTS.
     a. MM30 = GC 23% ๐Ÿ†š SC 26% (p=0.02)
     b. AdvEve (frequency + seriousness)= SIMILAR

     c. AdvEve RELATED TO GC = 0.5%

December, 2025

Thursday, December 18, 2025 at 17:30:45

MLHG, AMA, AAQC

[**2025 HARVARD - 6 new terms for healthy eating (godman) [r].pdf**](https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/agwdlhedhnucxccjdlafz/2025-HARVARD-6-new-terms-for-healthy-eating-godman-r.pdf?rlkey=ru13rc28pjkwvvy1574u9ek1p&dl=0)

`Codified by JQB`



Codified  by (MLHG)

Glossary:  ๐Ÿ‰ = fruits, ๐Ÿฅ— = salad, ๐ŸŒพ = corn, ๐Ÿฅœ = nuts, ๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ = oil




1. 6 new terms:
     a. Plant-forward
     c. Plant-based protein
     b. Clean eating
     d. Clean label expectations
     e. Sustainable eating
     f. A climate-conscious diet
2. These terms refer to:
     a. โ†‘ fruits โž• vegetables
     b. Online โž• venacular use
3. Plant-forward
     a. Same as PLANT-BASED
     b. FOCUS on ๐Ÿ‰, ๐Ÿฅ—, legumes (such as pea pods, peas, beans, and lentils), ๐ŸŒพ,
          ๐Ÿฅœ, seeds, and healthy vegetable ๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ (such as olive, canola, or peanut oil).
     c. MOMENTUM is the point of the term โžฉ gradually implementing โžฉ moving in that direction
4. Plant-based protein
     a. Rich in protein: legumes, nuts, seeds, and many whole grain
     b. Doubt โžฉ whole food ๐Ÿ†š processed foods
     c. No standarized definition
     d. High amount of plant protein โžฉ all mentioned โž• farro (Impossible + Beyond)
5. Clean eating
     a. Bussword ๐Ÿคฉ 
     b. Depends on people:
         i. Restaurateurs, manufacturers, SoMe infliuencers ๐ŸŸฐ WHOLE, UNPROCESSED                        FOODS
         ii. Plant-forward diet ๐ŸŸฐ packaged foods MININALLY processeed
6. Clean label expectations
     a. In response to CLEAN EATING
     b.Easily recognizable โžฉ refrigerator OR kitchen
     c. WONโ€™T HAVE:
        i. long chemical-sounding names
        ii. added sugars
        iii. artificial OR genetically MODIFIED
     d. Be cautious โžฉ **high in sugars & salt** โžฉ NOT necessarily healthier
7. Sustainable eating
     a. `Help` the ENVIRONMENT + health + PLANET
     b. LOWER carbon footprint than red meat (more resources โžฉ generate โ†‘ greenhouse gases โžฉ โ†‘ global warming)
     c. Roots + stems
8. A climate-conscious diet
     a. Similar to SUSTAINABLE EATING
     b. FOCUS โžฉ `preserve OR protect` the environment.
     c. We avoid:
        i. red meat production

        ii. unsustanable water + land use practice

     e. Try eating locally sourced plants โž• โ†“ red meat consumption

โณ**01:13:36**

`Round: 7 06:34:21 Comments
Round: 6 18:20:12 Wrap-up
Round: 5 31:17:12 Interpretation 2
Round: 4 00:09:70 Interpretation
Round: 3 06:25:23 Reading + notes
Round: 2 02:37:23 ART selection
Round: 1 08:12:98 Past JR + 10 min`

Friday, December 19, 2025 at 17:11:54 in BE

MLHG, AMA, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:53:07

Round: 11 33:17:79 Wrap-up
Round: 10 07:43:26 Results
Round: 9 27:47:94 Methods
Round: 8 01:35:92 Comments
Round: 7 10:15:81 Interpretation
Round: 6 03:27:81 Intro
Round: 5 00:25:44 Comments
Round: 4 07:41:05 Interpretation
Round: 3 07:47:27 Abstract (R+N)
Round: 2 05:41:63 SelectionRound: 1 07:23:60 Past JC

2025 JAMA - BICARICU-2, Sodium Bicarbonate for Severe Metabolic Acidemia + AKI (jung) [RCT].pdf

Codified  by (MLHG)

Glossary: โ˜… = recommendation(s), oSUPP = organ support, VP = vasopressin, iMV = invasive mechanical ventilation, LOS = length of stay, ICU_INF = ICU related infections, OF = organ failure, KRT = kidney replacement therapy, f-up = follow-up.




1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, JAMA, FR โž– ol_ii_mc_RCT โž• 640 (313 ๐Ÿ…ฒ ๐Ÿ†š 314 ๐Ÿ…ธ) [43 ICUs] โž• Oct 2019 - Dec 2023 (90d f-up)โž– P I C O:
     - P: CI pxs

     - ๐Ÿ…ธ: bicarbonate
     - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: no bicarbonate
     - O: pOC = MM90 | **sOC** = 18: MM28, MM180, oSUPP, VP, iMV, LOS, ICU_INFโ€ฆ
3. EVIDENCE.
      a. Consequences โžฉ ph โ‰ค 7,2 โžฉ imp_๐Ÿซ€ contractility + ๐Ÿ“ˆ + ๐Ÿซ vasoCONS + sys_vasoDIL + imp_โ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ + ๐Ÿง  edema + ๐Ÿ’ช๐ŸฝDYS
      b. Causes โžฉ โ†‘Cl acidosis + lactate โ†‘ + anion โ†‘
      c. BICARICU-1, 4,2% BICA ๐Ÿ†š no BICA (sev_metabolic acidemia)
           i. MM28 ยฑ OF7: NOT DIFFER.
           ii. Pre-planned ๐Ÿค“ of mod-sev_AKI โ–ถ๏ธŽ MM28: 63% ๐Ÿ…ฒ ๐Ÿ†š 46% ๐Ÿ…ธ
           iii. Same stratum (mod-sev_AKI) โ–ถ๏ธŽ KRT: 73% ๐Ÿ…ฒ ๐Ÿ†š 51% ๐Ÿ…ธ
      d. OBS study โžฉ benefits BICAR in pxs w_:
           i. sev_acidemia
           ii. sev_AKI
           iii. very sev_AKI (pH <7,15)
           iv. >60yo + sepsis + mod_acidemia
4. METHODS.
       - ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
       - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
       - RANDOM โž 
       - INTERV โž 
5. RESULTS.
      a. Primary ๐Ÿค“ โžฉ 90MM: 62,1% ๐Ÿ…ธ ๐Ÿ†š ๐Ÿ…ฒ 61,7%
      b. NO EVIDENCE of group effect โžฉ MM28, MM180
      c. 18 sec โžฉ KRT 35% ๐Ÿ†š 50% ๐Ÿ…ฒ
      d. NO EVIDENCE โžฉ other sOC.
6. RATIONALE.

7. LIMITATIONS.

Monday, December 15, 2025 at 17:02:22

MLHG, AMA, AAQC

2025 NEJMjw - SOFA-2 A Revised Organ Failure Score (JAMA).pdf

`Codified by ๐™„๐™‰๐˜ผ๐˜ผ๐™Œ๐˜พ แดฎแดผ (MASP)`

`


Glossary: ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ = abdomen = abdominal, ๐Ÿง  = brain, ๐Ÿซ€ = heart, โ™พ๏ธ = kidneys = renal, ๐Ÿซ = lungs, AF = atrial fibrillation, CI pxs = critically ill patients, HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula, OD = organ dysfunction, RRT = renal replacement therapy, sr = systematic review, vp = vasopressin.



1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, JAMA, โ“  โž– analysis (sr + AI computation + 10 databases) โž• 60 members โž• โ“ โž– P I C O:
      - P: CI pxs
      - ๐Ÿ…ธ: SOFA 2
      - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: NA

      - O: **pOC** = ICU mortality
3. EVIDENCE.
       a. APACHE + MODS + SOFA โžฉ vital organ function
       b . Quantitify ILNESS SEVERITY โžฉ CI pxs
       c. SEPSIS-3
          i. SOFA score
          ii. q-SOFA
          iii. Estimates OUTCOMES during conversations (**be cautious**)
4. METHODS.
     - After 3 decades โžฉ
          - 60-member international task force 
          - SOFA โœ–๏ธŽ ๐Ÿ†š  SOFA-1 โœ”๏ธŽ
5. RESULTS.
     a. SOFA-2 โžฉ 6 organs โ–ถ๏ธŽ ๐Ÿซ€ + ๐Ÿซ  + โ™พ๏ธ + ๐Ÿซƒ๐Ÿฝ + ๐Ÿง   + COAG
          i. 0-4 โžฉ TOTAL 0-24
          ii. MODERN SUPPORT: (4) ECMO, vp, RRT, HFNC
      b. MM risk โ–ถ๏ธŽ no BIG DIFFERENCE in `overall discrimitation`
          i. Score 4-8 ๐ŸŸฐ <20% MM
          ii. Score >16 ๐ŸŸฐ >75% MM
      c. Limitations with some VARIABLES
          i. Chronic OD
          ii. Acute-on-chronic OD
          iii. Clinical PRACTICE VARIABILITY
6. RATIONALE.
      a. USEFUL โžฉ advancing care โ–ถ๏ธŽ research + quality
      b. LESS USEFUL โžฉ bedside care โ–ถ๏ธŽ value remains LIMITED
      c. GESTALT remains the way to go

      d. Careful with GREY AREAS โžฉ MOST of our pxs โ–ถ๏ธŽ `FLIP A COIN` score (SOFA-2)

โณ**01:13:36**

`Round: 7 06:34:21 Comments
Round: 6 18:20:12 Wrap-up
Round: 5 31:17:12 Interpretation 2
Round: 4 00:09:70 Interpretation
Round: 3 06:25:23 Reading + notes
Round: 2 02:37:23 ART selection
Round: 1 08:12:98 Past JR + 10 min`

Friday, December 19, 2025 at 17:11:54 in BE

MLHG, AMA, AAQC

โณ TIME MANAGEMENT.
01:53:07

Round: 11 33:17:79 Wrap-up
Round: 10 07:43:26 Results
Round: 9 27:47:94 Methods
Round: 8 01:35:92 Comments
Round: 7 10:15:81 Interpretation
Round: 6 03:27:81 Intro
Round: 5 00:25:44 Comments
Round: 4 07:41:05 Interpretation
Round: 3 07:47:27 Abstract (R+N)
Round: 2 05:41:63 SelectionRound: 1 07:23:60 Past JC

2025 JAMA - BICARICU-2, Sodium Bicarbonate for Severe Metabolic Acidemia + AKI (jung) [RCT].pdf

Codified  by (MLHG)

Glossary: โ˜… = recommendation(s), oSUPP = organ support, VP = vasopressin, iMV = invasive mechanical ventilation, LOS = length of stay, ICU_INF = ICU related infections, OF = organ failure, KRT = kidney replacement therapy, f-up = follow-up.




1. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS โžฉ Y, J, C โž– T โž• N โž• t โž– P I C O:
2. ๐™„๐™Œ๐˜พ BS ๐ŸŸฐ 2025, JAMA, FR โž– ol_ii_mc_RCT โž• 640 (313 ๐Ÿ…ฒ ๐Ÿ†š 314 ๐Ÿ…ธ) [43 ICUs] โž• Oct 2019 - Dec 2023 (90d f-up)โž– P I C O:
     - P: CI pxs

     - ๐Ÿ…ธ: bicarbonate
     - ๐Ÿ…ฒ: no bicarbonate
     - O: pOC = MM90 | **sOC** = 18: MM28, MM180, oSUPP, VP, iMV, LOS, ICU_INFโ€ฆ
3. EVIDENCE.
      a. Consequences โžฉ ph โ‰ค 7,2 โžฉ imp_๐Ÿซ€ contractility + ๐Ÿ“ˆ + ๐Ÿซ vasoCONS + sys_vasoDIL + imp_โ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ + ๐Ÿง  edema + ๐Ÿ’ช๐ŸฝDYS
      b. Causes โžฉ โ†‘Cl acidosis + lactate โ†‘ + anion โ†‘
      c. BICARICU-1, 4,2% BICA ๐Ÿ†š no BICA (sev_metabolic acidemia)
           i. MM28 ยฑ OF7: NOT DIFFER.
           ii. Pre-planned ๐Ÿค“ of mod-sev_AKI โ–ถ๏ธŽ MM28: 63% ๐Ÿ…ฒ ๐Ÿ†š 46% ๐Ÿ…ธ
           iii. Same stratum (mod-sev_AKI) โ–ถ๏ธŽ KRT: 73% ๐Ÿ…ฒ ๐Ÿ†š 51% ๐Ÿ…ธ
      d. OBS study โžฉ benefits BICAR in pxs w_:
           i. sev_acidemia
           ii. sev_AKI
           iii. very sev_AKI (pH <7,15)
           iv. >60yo + sepsis + mod_acidemia
4. METHODS.
       - ๐—œ๐—ก โž 
       - ๐—˜๐—ซ โž 
       - RANDOM โž 
       - INTERV โž 
5. RESULTS.
      a. Primary ๐Ÿค“ โžฉ 90MM: 62,1% ๐Ÿ…ธ ๐Ÿ†š ๐Ÿ…ฒ 61,7%
      b. NO EVIDENCE of group effect โžฉ MM28, MM180
      c. 18 sec โžฉ KRT 35% ๐Ÿ†š 50% ๐Ÿ…ฒ
      d. NO EVIDENCE โžฉ other sOC.
6. RATIONALE.

7. LIMITATIONS.